Reddit chess rating Everyone is saying the starting ratings are different and that's the reason for the discrepancy but you can choose your starting rating on chess. The rating on the page uses different calculations for the different time controls and websites (based on your past 100 games). The vast majority of chess players (68%) are within 300 ratings of the average. com puzzle rating is ~3350. Blitz vs Rapid Rating chess. It's entirely geared toward generating more play. " But if you do the comparison the other way around, you get: A rating of 2188 in Chess. So if you're 1200 and beat a 1300 you'll get more points than if you beat an 1100. com rating is LOWER than your actual rating by 100-150 points. com from completely new who played a few times then stopped (cause of Queens gambit, twitch, etc. com, and the time format includes games as short as 10 minutes per player to as long as 60 minutes per player. Never studied it, it was all fun and games with friends. Opening theory is still To answer the OP, 1200-1400 is a respectable rating for most. com is ~670 rapid. com Blitz, yet when I was 2220 chess. com blitz rating of 2000 is actually a serious accomplishment. Specifically, because in my own experience I have found that Blitz is 70% Intuition and 20% Faster Calculation Ability and 10% Strategy - With intuition being so high in percentage, it also Nah its really common to have a puzzle rating much higher than your live chess rating. I wouldn't care too much for accuracy scores. " So I Time. Thinking about this logically. com. true. To start with Elo which is what's used over the board. In all the online clubs However, if you're looking to improve your over-all chess and/or have hit a plateau in your blitz rating - it is recommended by me that you FOCUS ON RAPID. "Chess Tactics from Scratch" by Martin Weteschnik - Quality Chess. I made around 4000 puzzles on chess. com uses Glicko as the rating system (compared to FIDE ELO). com is close to Top 1% on the site, but note that online sites are extremely bottom-loaded (something like 70% of the players are playing with barely any chess knowledge). My lichess account sits between 1900-2000 and I generally screw around, go for sacrifices, play while drunk, etc. Hi, So I a 24y. com and ended with a puzzle rating of ~2250. com, and 2100 on lichess (on lichess im 2200 bullet, 2100 blitz, 2000 rapid). My peak rating is 1520 USCF and my floor is 1300. I'll add my anecdote. It matters in the sense that if you're spending the same amount of effort and it's going up, maybe you're getting better at puzzles and maybe that will help in actually playing. If you are asking what your elo means, and your 1250, you At what rating range is chess the most "fun" to play? I'd say it's 1600-1800 FIDE. I doubt this is the real reason. Speaking very, very roughly:This implies chess. Likewise, your chess. com players, which I would definitely call "good. The effect is that the more puzzles you do the higher your rating goes even if your "Rapid" chess is the second-longest time format behind "daily" chess on chess. Idk all of the stats, but good could mean the top 50%, top 10%, a certain number (arbitrarily set), and is most likely different for everybody. I think you can get a floor of 2000 or 2200 by winning a certain amount of money or by winning the tournament in You can compare your puzzle rating to somebody else's puzzle rating to get an estimate of the difference in tactical skill but it's not comparable to either of your chess ratings. A 2000 blitz player shouldn't have a 2000 puzzle rating - the numbers are close to arbitrary. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Lichess base rating starts higher, but then you gain less per win. He basically only plays bullet though. It depends on how seriously you treat the puzzles. Even if you are playing the longest Blitz variant which would be 5 minutes that is still half of the shortest variant of Rapid which would be 10 minutes. Chess. I think chess. And had a rating for 2300 and was rated in the top 250 best chess players of her time but never even close to the top 50. My blitz rating is like 1500, but my puzzle rating is 2400 on chess. Reddit's #1 spot for Pokémon GO™ discoveries and research. Every chess player goes through the 700-800 rating phase, and the ones who overcome it find it extremely silly when they look back at their initial games and spot multiple blunders! Even I am a 1400-1500 rated player currently and I have conquered the "beginner" stage without taking any private lessons with an International Master or anything! This chess. Get an account on lichess. The accepted wisdom seems to be that Chesscom puzzle ratings are about 1000 points above Chesscom Rapid ratings - at least to 2000 Rapid. If the game is slow and boring, your accuracy will always be higher, because your position doesn't worsen much when making passive moves. It's more of a novelty and doesn't give much insight on how well you played. This can be scary at first, and you are guaranteed to lose your first five or six games if you’re totally new, but after those games your ELO (rating of how good you are) will be more accurate and you’ll be matched with other beginners. We can guesstimate a conversion between Chesscom Rapid and Lichess Rapid ratings, but I'm not sure how to convert the Puzzle ratings. As mentioned in the other thread this study suggests that the mathematical model inaccurately predicts the chances for a lower rated player to win against a higher rated player in ways that could be systematically abused to artificially raise your rating. Agreed, not sure why you're getting downvoted. The Silph Road is a grassroots network of trainers Being 1600 rapid on Chess. I am about 1500 fide, 1700 in my countries rating, about 2000 on chess. (These are VERY rough estimates pulled from what seems to be the closest to average ratings. I was reading a thread on r/Chess and I saw people say: "The only reason I play on Chess. You are a decent club player but nothing special. As a 1500+ rated player who goes to the chess club often, I absolutely would not want to play chess with this guy, the minimum rating I would want to play with (and the minimum rating at our club) is 1000-1200. Online ratings are even a bit more hazy, but probably like 1400 on chess. com 1400+ rapid & 1000+ bullet; and I only play 2|1 bullet). com rating of ~1300 (I know, not actually good, but it was the U1400 section and most players were around 900-1100, so I Yep, it's as simple as that. A better way to gauge this is that it's closer to the level an average club player would reach in 2 years. It’s very weird since I’m at 90 percentile in rapid but in The same current engine evaluating centipawn loss as lower for rating-2500 game today as rating-2500 game from 20 years ago means there has been rating deflation; if a 2500 had been frozen in 2000 and unfrozen today they would be I borrowed everything they had at my city library, really old books from the 1960s and 1970s Tals 100 Best Games, Spassky's 100 Best Games, 100 Soviet Chess miniatures (great book) Joined my school chess club played against my friends and other students blitz at lunch recess after school and I played in scholastic tournaments whenever one was I noticed most of the games I lose are when I lose control over the middle early. Afterwards, like 3/4 years ago I created an account in chess. While the ratings on different sites are not equivalent, they are actual estimates of playing ability relative to a large pool of players, unlike the Elo meter. Instead of pragmatically adjusting to 1200 instead of 1500, lichess has a whole page explaining why rating systems aren't comparable (which is demonstrably false - ratings at different sites and FIDE ratings are all pretty well correlated). We would like to extend our special thanks to Hans Arild Runde for his ground-breaking idea of calculating and regularly updating the live chess ratings of elite players, to Dr Christopher Wright for his contribution to the all-important early development of this site and thanks to Mark Crowther at TWIC for sharing PGN of games that are difficult to get Basically it's an algorithm that runs your elo rating vs your opponents elo rating and then assigns you points whether you win lose or draw, based on the disparity in rating. We encourage day 1, I won my first game on chess. com account. "Chess Tactics for Advanced Players" by Yuri Averbakh - Ishi Press. The best use of tactics in real games is defensive, allowing you to avoid blunders. com rating -100 = FIDE rating. It's impressive for the amount of work she's willing to put in to improve her chess, but also pretty I have a rating of 1350 on chess. It really doesn't matter as 3 days ago One of the most asked questions in chess is "what is a good rating" or "what does this rating mean"? This enthusiasm should be addressed accurately to foster realistic goals for However, my actual chess. Using reasonable metrics of "goodness", any player above a chess. It has almost nothing to do with game rating. There is a big overlap in the graph - but that overlap is mostly 2400-2700 chess. com and 1800-2000 on lichess. Wolf". If you look at the learderboard, the top players are rated about 100 to 200 rating points lower on Lichess ;) A nice benefit of playing on both is if one of your ratings get too high and you are protective of your rating, you can just play on the other site until your rating reaches comparative highs. The more time I have, the closer my rating should be to my puzzle rating. reddit By elo, do you mean Fide ratings, chess. - you might have had a bad day - 15xx rating is notorious for new players (not calibrated) and maybe some f*** Well, think about it like this. Sample size: the entire population of A club member told me that "online ratings tend to be usually 100-200 higher than your FIDE one" so I was very worried, as I'm 1100 on Chess dot com. "Attacking the Strongpoint" I once watched a 2400+ player blunder his queen two games in a row. The thing is there's so many brand new accounts on chess. Mark "Super Samoan" Hunt has a chess. His peak bullet rating is over 2000. com ratings or lichess ratings? I haven't played a lot of official fide games. Now I am 2000 puzzles deep on Lichess and am slowly climbing up at 2050. com Rapid rating, is typically +~200 higher than USFC, and +~100 higher than FIDE. The important thing is getting the instant feedback and the explanation, which is hard to get any other way. com playing 10-minute games, however I seem to be stuck around 1000 in the blitz category, usually playing 5-minute games. The median-rated player on chess. Took a break, started watching the lessons and doing puzzles, then yesterday started playing against bots from lowest rating until it started getting tough, which was 1600. Rating floors is usually I think determined by your peak rating - 200 to the nearest hundred. Chess Question Hello, I recently reached 1400 rapid on chess. com is less than 1000, so if you hit 1000 you're already better than half of all chess. com Rapid as being equivalent to 2400 chess. My friend recently made a chess. com does nothing of the sort so if more players with lots of rating gets inactive, they remove points from the pool (that aren't there Also in response to your "better rating system", chess. com puzzle rating system is pretty arbitrary, as the points you gain/lose do not scale properly with puzzles that are far below your rating. Wolf explains why he's making his moves, and says what's good or bad about your moves. Literally, my rating 📈 is made up of a steady climb with peaks and valleys. Eventually you just have to accept that your rating describes I think if you just study positional strategy and openings for a bit, you could easily double your actual chess ratings. The moderator team of r/chessbeginners wishes to remind everyone of the community rules. My lichess/drunk account ratings exceeded my "proper" account within about a month. However, my last OTB games saw me draw against a 1500 and win against a 1400 - two results that I'd Plus there is also plenty of evidence to suggest that your chess. com rating - I think that is more likely to be the overlap of NMs who care a lot about their chess. org and/or chess. com blitz rating. My chess. The similarity is that they both get you points proportional to the strength of your opponent and outcome of the game, but Glicko has a Rating Deviance (RD) that accounts for uncertainty because maybe you stopped playing and got In Blitz? Well, 1600 to 2300 took a year, and 2300 to 2400 took another six months. As best as I can tell, this is new as of the past week Chess. Elo and Glicko (and Glicko-2). com: Blitz, with an average variation of plus/minus of 252 points. That said, CM, FM, IM, and GM titles also have minimum rating requirements (every 100 points, starting at 2200). com instead of Lichess is because I was told that the ratings are closer to FIDE. Higher your rating, better at chess you are. 1500-1600 is what many consider "good. Rapid offers a lot more time for you to think. Having feeling like I've reached a plateau in my game, I am committed to investing in a chess coach. That being said 1600 is really impressive! You are focusing on the right thing 2000 chess. Has over 70,000 bullet games played, 100 blitz games, and no rapid games. com's Game Review appears to have a new module added to it that tries to estimate the rating performance of both players, as well as how they played in each phase of the game. Many of those people have played for less than a year, many for more than a year. com's rating system is not a system based on Chess skill. When I started playing simple, strategically sound chess, my rating went back to normal quickly enough. com blitz rating, and GMs who don't care in the slightest Because ELO systems can't be directly compared, none of these correlate directly to FIDE ratings, or ratings in other games. com is probably equivalent to about 1300 FIDE rating, but if you have a bad tournament (and many of us struggle on our first tournament), you might not get assigned a FIDE rating at all. These might seem like high numbers, but it's important to realize that rating and skill aren't a linear correlation. If you are new to the game, check out /r/chessbeginners and before posting here please read our rules: https://www. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets; Cringe & Facepalm; Funny; I'm 1800 fide (with the rating 909 votes, 467 comments. Posting spam, advertising links (including YouTube chess tutorial videos without context), and memes is not allowed. I’ve played chess occasionally for fun in high school. The easy glide to 1000 probably means you’re appropriately placed in that range. Lichess has ways to ensure that the average stays around 1500 (messing with the rating). com: Blitz would equal People are posting how much a beginner could improve in a year. Play games until the rating stabilizes. then I lost 3 games, but my rating never went below 1000. com chart presents 2220 chess. But 1000's are "good" at playing chess, if that makes sense, given that they will beat 95% of all people who don't play chess regularly but at least know the rules. The elo system is a mathematical model, and as such it may not be a perfect fit to real world conditions. com in rapid and I have been playing for about 3 months starting at 700, I still feel unsatisfactory with my rating and when I have been trying to get into blitz and bullet I get destroyed. com, by pure luck, which put me into the 1300s. These differ as you go higher in ratings). com have a puzzle rating of 50000 lmao. com average is actually 1200 probably. com rating -200=USCF. Diamond in LoL then corresponds to a US "NM" title, or a FIDE "CM" title, roughly speaking. com and I wanted to share some advice containing what I think I did right in order to reach this level: Analyze your games Do not play Blitz or Bullet games Try to understand the idea behind an opponent's move Always scout the board for weaknesses A chess. com gave the choice of having lower starting Elo values. There was the big influx of newbies due to the Covid/Queen's Gambit perfect storm, and, in order to stave off the inflationary pressures of starting them at 1200 (since most of them would likely be lower and would just be swamping more experience players with Elo points), chess. The way the ELO system works someone who is 100 points higher will win roughly 2/3 games. This is where the work begins! At that rating, the goal is to not make blunders and play sound, principled Above average among chess players, using lichess blitz, 50% is ~1550. But 1500 Elo places you in the top 5 % of players, and most average players have to work quite hard to reach this skill level; Yet, it almost seems more challenging to feel good about one's rating, and appreciate progress, since the vibe you get from reddit/YouTube pretend to place the average chess player at 2000 or something along the lines. " This is highly recommended for chess improvement. Play way more blitz though 5:3 and seem to make great climbs in my rating when something clicks, then I seem to bomb and nosedive sometimes 50+ points in a matter of a few days. popularising it and that being the goto) that makes it look like being 1800cc is top 1% of players or something even more ridiculous than that. If a player hits a wall and stops playing because their rating doesn't you can see your percentile on chess. com and selected a starting rating of 1200 (which I did not now what was haha). She lost a lot as is reality. com Rapid rating of 1900 is definitely a good player, and any player above 1500 is There are two rating systems being used. His chess kids rating and his chess. " and "I would play on Lichess if the ratings weren't so inflated. I’m basically you (tens of thousands of games, mostly bullet, with no study beyond occasional tactical puzzles), except my highest win rate opening as black is the Englund gambit (I never really learned how to deal with 1. com . com Rapid, The top guys on Chess. Rating reflects skill, but the skill increase required to reflect a rating increase grows exponentially as you get better. com blitz rating is at least 200 points lower than that. Which would make sense as my lichess rating is about 1400 but I never really use that, so I don't really Three weeks ago I was going 1-3 in provisional matches and am 850 rated. Sometimes people just have bad days, it's not about rating. I'm fairly certain the average rating on chess. Puzzle rating is usually 500-1000 higher than whatever other rating ou want to look at. If you continue to put in 3-4 hours of dedicated work and do the right things, taking into account that you are 1200 currently, I would estimate that you begin to close in on it in maybe 2-3 years, but could also take longer. If you’re not completely sure that the tactic is working, play a normal move instead (or really invest the time if you feel there is a win). Although I often find myself spending more time working on higher-rated puzzles, I can solve most 2800-2900 puzzles in half to one minute, and many of my 3000-3300 puzzles were solved in 1-4 minutes, making my rating make sense. Google elo probability table and you should be able to figure out how many ELO point he needs to gain on chess kids to be equivalent to what you are asking on chess. I also have a huge rating difference between bullet and rapid, my bullet rating is a lot lower (on lichess 1700+ rapid & 1100+ bullet, on chess. Too broad of parameters to answer the question I felt really good going into my first USCF tournament with a Chess. At 500 level, pretty much all games are decided by people not noticing pieces are under attack, moving pieces onto squares where they can just be captured, not counting attackers and defenders when exchanging, not noticing they can capture the opponent's pieces, and The rating calculation between different time controls and each website can vary a lot. Most people aren't going to spend days, months, or years in order to learn opening theory, practice tactics, read books, or do any Hi, I'm David, the maker of "Learn Chess with Dr. on lichess. com rapid trying my absolute hardest over a long period of time. com among active users* You won't be able to see how many games the average player has, but I think you're gonna find that there is a very stark bias towards stronger and more serious players when you go looking for data on a chess forum vs the real player pool. I knew how to move each piece before I started playing, so I wasn't an absolute beginner, but still I was new. And she did manage after several attempts to beat a grandmaster. You also want to play against real people, not computers. Above average among all adults I feel like the bar is like 1100-1200. Hello r/chess, . The chess. By definition, puzzle solving cannot be an Elo rating because it isn’t a zero sum game Good is very relative. com rating give you a good starting point. com rapid and blitz and I know that's better than a lot of people but considering the best players are 2800 plus I'm not sure how to feel Special Thanks. It's aimed at beginners & intermediates, so from 0 up to 1300-1500 chess. 40 votes, 92 comments. " Most never reach 1800+ OTB, so I guess that's a good goal to be considered good. The games can be interesting and fun. It's a basic function where your rating, your opponent's rating, the 2200s+ are 'very strong'. Dr. Don't focus too much on the "Lichess rating = Chesscom rating + 300", because that's not accurate. Nothing as extreme as that, but sometimes the blitz tv will show two players playing a series of games against eachother, and usually they are evenly matched, but sometimes I see a player taking loss after loss until . "Simple Chess: Algebraic Edition" by Michael Stean - Dover Publications. For reference, the current world champion is rated 2862. Elo is only a relative measure, not an absolute one. I recently hit 1800 on Chess. I am over ~2000 classical on Lichess, and my national rating roughly translates to a FIDE rating of about 1900. There are some short-term fluctuations in the rating distributions (sometimes rating x IS actually more difficult and my whole friend list is gaining/losing rating at the same time). Currently 1700 on chess. Yeah, I did that. At some level Lichess ratings are even lower than on chesscom. I am currently hovering between a 1700-1800 puzzle rating while my blitz rating is between 1300-1400. com has ,ore drills, lessons, and a bigger playerbase for faster games while lichess has great puzzles, studies, and IMO more intuitive UI. com account and he chose the highest rating option so he started at 1800. Also had an account for playing chess when I'm drunk and/or problematically tired. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS. And it only takes your current rating (the rating from the last game you've played) into account for your current rating. com got repetitive and kept repeating the same tactics A rating of 2000 in FIDE: Standard would equal 2188 in Chess. You asked for the average rating of someone after a year, which is different. and chess. d4 as everyone in my neighborhood growing up played e4). The existence of female exclusive titles in chess is sort of a weird historical artifact, since women can and increasingly do get the “regular” titles now, but there’s a whole list of them and they generally require a rating 200 points less than the correspondingly named open title. If you want my advice, I'd recommend prioritising game experience (preferably in longer time controls) over studying; if you're going to study, analyse your games with an engine and try to pay attention to seemingly surprising or counterintuitive suggestions - I've found the most valuable nuggets of I recently reached an important landmark for me: 1500 rating on chess. It's also complicated by your strength. djuepnj lajkudx scxyshkl fusjtbi pplg srtarhf bvl bwf mfgyx auzat nblrz yyxa ffjipn cclbdad cepcl