Logseq vs roam reddit. No idea on performance though.
Logseq vs roam reddit Other than that, I just want to increase the padding around blocks, because Roam has a tiny bit more space in between them making Markdown is pretty easy to learn. ) The last couple of years could be classified as “the rise of the connected note-taking app. One of my major needs is the ability to address any element such as a bullet, as a block. I am building an alternative to Roam Research for six months now. I do however use logseq for outlining, storing all my kindle highlights and notes from things I read on the internet and its superb for retrieval and context. There is no "best for PKM". I can't imagine trying to make that work. They have almost no two-way integrations. It's been out for longer and it has a bigger community. Capacities or Logseq. I've gone thru Evernote, Notion (hate it so much), Obsidian (too hard to get productive), logseq (decent but hard to customize), Roam (bought the believer tier and never used it). This veteran PKM writer needed that capability so much that he linked Obsidian and Logseq to get the best of both worlds. Comparison guide of infinite outliner apps: Workflowy vs Dynalist vs Moo. Zettlr is based on electron. I would absolutely recommend it. Notion vs Roam vs Obsidian vs RemNote. And like in apps like Dynalist, Logseq and Roam have the breadcrumb bar over the right pane that users can use to navigate through their hierarchy. The pace of LogSeq's development feels sluggish compared to Obsidian. For instance in my notes I have links to email, so send a new message to someone (a note a contact), see all messages with he/she/it, see specific thread or messages etc via notmuch. Mind mapping could also be considered a method of PKM. Logseq’s block-level implementation of tagging (versus the page-level tagging in most other apps) makes Logseq particularly good for the whole “Just work from the journal page” strategy. How to setup seamless, automatic synchronization (over git) between the 2 devices Joplin seems garbage, and Logseq is a walking data stability bug. J. On balance, for me, the new quest is Logseq vs Athens given that I can forge a deeper relationship with the core Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I was primarily using Org-roam for bi-directional links before my switch. This easily syncs from one to the other allowing me to access my notes on multiple machines. it's hyper-limited and limiting :: compared to Emacs it can only do a hyper limited fraction of things, and I can't extend it. Tried to find on reddit, on this forum, but had no luck. Apps like Obsidian and Roam have the ability to help people use those PKM techniques effectively IF someone chooses to do that. Logseq on the other hand is open source and has a bunch of plugins. Of the applications you mention you would want to avoid vendor lock-in and logseq and obsidian achieve this by allowing you to work in org-mode and/or Logseq is light years faster opening than Roam was at the time - don't know if Roam is significantly improved but I'd be amazed if downloading your graph from the web every time you reopen is faster than Logseq opens from desktop files. org mode is objectively much more capable format then markdown, specifically designed for managing knowledge, time check in, planning, scheduling and deadlines build into it and many I would say the main difference is how you think about pages, structure and writing. Members Online Logseq does at least 90% of what Roam does (as well as many things that Roam can't do) for $0. Apps like Roam, Obsidian and RemNote can do that. You can manually import your exported Joplin notes into Logseq but will have to modify all of the image paths to reference the 'assets' folder and copy those images to that folder. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment. Tags don't exist in Roam, so trying to use actual tags like pages in Roam is just asking for trouble. But Obsidian is utterly, blindingly fast - in terms of pure speed, there is no comparison. because it it missing some filters, for example having the option to not show the tags in the graph or choose what to show, ecc. But at the root it’s a backlinking note taking bullet style app and it’s amazing. Valheim; Genshin Impact; Workflowy vs Dynalist vs Moo. --- If you have questions or are new to Python use r/LearnPython An Airtable RemNote baby hybrid would be insanely awesome. It's clear that a graph database is a better base to build a Roam-like system, and using Markdown as base truth is a hack, although it has some practical advantages. gg/URphjhk The #1 Reddit source for news, information, and discussion about modern board games and board game culture. otherwise I am satisfied. I recently installed logseq, intersted in giving it a shot, but I was surprised to read in the docs: When it's your first time using an outliner tool like Logseq, we recommend you write everything on the Journals page of that day. The ability to find things quickly, not lose my current cursor position and sometimes see lots of high level and detailed information at once is important. But there is a big difference between the eco-systems. If you want to create your PKM in flowing text go for obsidian. Logseq is open source so that one has a high chance of survival if people actually want it. It seems like there are more people to be found interested in PKM in Obsidian and In Roam/Logseq once you link a block X1 from page A and put it in page B (let's call the new block X2, same block just different position), the two blocks are more or less the same. And yeah, I think MD is a has come to stay. Some Roam apologists say a mobile experience isn't required I have been using Roam as my note-taking app for two years. Hi. Logseq is an outliner vs Joplin being more of a long form note-taking tool. But because the same is true for taskwarrior over org-mode, I can immediately understand why someone would live in Emacs and choose logseq over org-roam. Okay so some background, I have been searching (mainly) for a personal note taking app and maybe some studying, I found 3 great great apps suited for my needs: 1- Joplin 2- obsidian 3- logseq . I encountered Roam and its implementation of Backlinking and networked thoughts. Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organising and sharing your knowledge base and second brain. It getting the right setup all figured out. Important_Power_5845 I seriously consider to switch to logseq. Also check out Org-Roam. Recently Roam founder hosted a reddit AMA, where they blocked anyone who raised a concern. Logseq doesn't charge its users $15 a month. For reference, I use the following plugins in obsidian: Dataview We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. With Obsidian, you can see a full outline of your document in the side panel while also being able to see the entire content of the note. I tested it and it works but I'll need to do more testing in the future. Really liked logseq because it’s outliner by default but sync solution and mobile app isn’t there yet I've seen a lot of posts where people have been comparing Logseq and org-roam, and also about converting between them. Although I love plain text the reality is that Logseq is one of the few outliners that use markdown to store the information instead of a database, and that's what makes it slow, depending on your hardware, for example if you don't have an NVMe, or SSD at least, it's going to be noticeable if you have a bunch of notes, this, to an extent, will be fixed by using a database. There is currently no alternate with respect to speed of note taking and revising as in Remnote because of its no differentiation between block and page references and a keyboard shortcut to expand or collapse all nested blocks/rem which are currently present only in remnote among roam research, obsidian , logseq and notion. In the past year, Roam Research raised $9 million dollars (with a $200 million valuation) , Obsidian was nominated for the Product Hunt Golden Kitty award for the Productivity category, and countless other note-taking apps entered the productivity space with their own My main problem has been the format. Hi, I would love to transition from Remnote to Logseq, but the Remnote's export function OR the Logseq's import don't work, like, at all. What Obsidian, Logseq, Roam want you to create is a wide ranging set of notes. I'll never switch from org-roam to logseq. js and is a modern markdown editor with advanced export options (using pandoc) and inbuilt citing. /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind This is the official subreddit for Roam Research, the tool for networked thought. Are there any list of things, in which roam and logseq are different? These are the main benefits in my eyes compared to Roam: The development seems to be extremely fast and heavily based off feedback. Org-roam's community is much smaller than Obsidian's or Logseq's community. On obsidian the "attraction" between nodes is handled better. If you look at the Gardener style products (Zettlekasten software) they are aimed at deep understanding and analysis of a topic. But OneNote can create bi-directional links that related a linked paragraph or page to the page that opened the link. The experience with Obsidian between multiple windows + multiple panes + multiple tabs is much much smoother than in Logseq. While I wouldn't switch away from Roam I wouldn't pick it as aa new user today. In Logseq there is no hierarchy between pages or other structure (aside from the network of references). For me, that's a minus. Logseq has its plugin marketplace, Roam has code based expandability - again, benefits and tradeoffs each way. Recommending Logseq over Roam Research is easy if you are someone who is searching for a free alternative to Roam Research. When asking a question or stating a problem, please add as much detail as possible. If you enjoyed the block-based features in Logseq, you will appreciate Roam's consistency, thoughtful design, and dependability. logseq doesn't support sync with Nextcloud as Joplin. Really cool and the pace with which they are improving and adding features to logseq is quite amazing. It is clojure/clojurescript/datalog which, for me, is satisfying. How to address main issues. The Calendar, Jump to link, graph view, and Minimal Theme plug ins are killer!). This is pretty amazing: you can simply open a page in Chrome, point to the folder you want to work with, and you have a nice knowledge graph visualized. This graph runs in its own window of your system web browser (or you can specify a different browser, as I have done). Logseq's magic sidebar is also helpful for playing with blocks of information since every bullet in Logseq and Roam is a block. Logseq doesn't ban people from their subreddit for disagreeing with Roam's Dear Leader. Markdown support; Bi-directional linking; Search and filter; Belt & suspenders because I count on logseq for everything in my life. Alternatively OneNote can create links between different paragraphs. For about long time I was fiddling with knowledge management, note-taking and journaling there. Obsidian can't do that. Though I love the tool. Then I can make use of most of the functionality within emacs and come to logseq for notes and still have compatibility between the two. But I did not found a useful comparison between loqseq vs remnote vs obsidian. And i started trying remnotes too - i was blown away by its integration with spaced revision and how good it integrates with reading books since you can make notes of your pdf/epub highlights - add your insights to them and make flashcards from them. It couldn't do that in the past. OneNote's a great tool; I used it this morning. Roam Research - great for academics and non-linear thinkers. Well there's going to be a lot available on Roam compared to Tana given that Roam has been on the market for nearly 3-4 years, is beyond beta version and has full releases, had a lot of funding, has a sizeable community of developers developing plugins with the recently opened Roam plugin store (aka Roam Depot). Logseq vs Roam Research. I would still switch to Obsidian if they started supporting org format. The main pane is far too wide for me, the text is too big, not enough contrast, and the spacing between the blocks is too small. All in all, we recommend Obsidian over Roam Research. Background: Roam believer originally, mobile workflow became a sticking point. Like Obsidian, Logseq stores notes in Markdown files on your local computer (albeit as bulleted, indented lists). I picked Heptabase from this family. I use LogSeq as a replacement for Roam Research for two reasons, firstly because it is very close to Roam Research in functionality (at its core: block-based outliner with backlinking) but is free, and secondly because it keeps my data local and doesn't store it in the cloud. Also the connections between the nodes are overlapping a lot. I managed to use rclone bidrectional sync to take care of this. My impression of Logseq is that it gives you a little more Roam-style drag-and-drop blocks and nested lists, and a little more task-management power. I like that it does syntax highlighting, and that you can turn on "developer mode" and find an extension called Tokyo that happens to contain the Tokyo Night theme and a few others that make Logseq match my favorite VS Code themes :) I also liked Dendron, but prefer Logseq because it doesn't need a "preview" window, and has syntax highlighting. Newer software like Obsidian, Roam, and Logseq come from a different lineage: Integrated Development Environments (IDEs), which are software programs used to code software. For the general features, having used both extensively I would say Logseq wins. (They are outlined below. Ironically, I find it just as useful (if not more) than Logseq's outliner. For example, Logseq lacks folder structure, which is important for me, as I'd like to write drafts of my papers in the same environment. Obsidian's outliner seems to now let me create a link to a nested bullet item. A lot seems to prefer Obsidian (me included) for it's offline capability and non-proprietary format. it is quite a popular tool. Have been looking at org-roam, Obsidian, LogSeq and RemNote. You can just cite my Reddit username, thanks! Reply reply More replies More replies. It's just so logic and freaking clean. . logseq doesn't support data encryption. This is one one the key features that sets Logseq apart. View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. Using Roam on mobile is laughable. More broadly, the big difference is that Athena uses a graph database as its ground truth, while Logseq uses Markdown files. I work best with outliners because we can create nested hierarchies quickly. Mind mapping First, like you noticed, just trying to import markdown into Logseq isn't easy. Like Roam Research before it, Logseq is a true outliner, using indentation to establish and clarify relationships between ideas. But that's my impression. com. I love logseq but I am pushed away by the electron thing, and the fact that I am not allowed to use it at work. Logseq looks very interesting, but I'm curious to understand a few things: Both Logseq and Obsidian use markdown files, but is there a difference in format? For example, can both programs read each other's files? How does Logseq 'index' all the files and links for speed exactly? Former Logseq user here. Å) with Roam Research (later he widened it to the other popular TfTs) and jumped on that. This issue is something related to the way the graph is build from a technical point of view. Now I have started looking into logseq as it supports org format. His instructions are pretty simple. Other tools have attempted to replicate Roam's advantages but fail to Hi, I am reading this very interesting post and thread and I have a few questions. Its brilliant and just what I need. I'm happy with Roam's functionality but not so much with the lock-in it represents. Also, Logseq team is still working on the db version, which is a major overhaul in the app's architecture. https://discord. While the tools overlap in many areas, Logseq does some things differently from what you might be used to. Org-roam (Emacs) Org-roam is a roam replica and may be the closest match in terms of functionality - even with charts connecting your notes! Zettlr. Considering that Obsidian isn't running a server (something lik Roam or Evernote) and the entire "company" (or better to call them team) is consisting of 2 programmers and 2 more administrative workers, i doubt they can sort though what looks like ~700,000 users' data (logseq is at about ~80,000 users). In Tana the tree structure for nodes is enforced. Join the community and come discuss games like Codenames, Wingspan, Brass, and all your That’s one of the main reasons I’m wavering between LogSeq and Roam. ). Roam, the originator of the bi-link notes craze, is naturally well finished and does an excellent job with the feature details. I’m working on a comparison between Roam and Logseq to If you've been using Roam for a while but want to see if Logseq would be a good fit for you, this video by Shu Omi is a great starting point. It also has the ability to Honestly, with some slight adjustments, Obsidian can do pretty much everything Roam can—you just have to use/learn some plugins. but logseq is reasonably attractive Now, I use Obsidian essentially as my storage for class notes, book notes, saved websites, and everything in between. You get almost feature-parity between both I love everything about Logseq and just experienced few and very small issues, like sometimes it gets laggy, but just refreshing or reindexing gets it working normally again. Introducing Logseq - a roam like open-source, org-mode web outliner which sync with Github. I want to use the built-in calendar as a task calendar -- it's already there! More importantly however, the behavior of reddit leadership in implementing these changes has been reprehensible. It might be also worth considering that the price difference between Obsidian (Free) + Obsidian Sync ($10/mo) is not significant compared with Heptabase ($11. There's even a Markdown cheat-sheet. For me, it's more of a pain than a help, compared to syncthing. Depends how comfortable you are with doing this, but (speaking as somebody who was in your position a few months ago) one advantage of Logseq over Roam is that it uses readable markdown files -- what this means is you can open the folder in VSCode (for example) and do a find-and-replace across all files. This is the official subreddit for Roam Research, the tool for networked thought. There are a number of UX/philosophy choices in roam that just remove that extra 10% of friction, even compared to apps that have the same "feature set". Both Logseq and Zettlr seem to force you into workflow. I moved to Obsidian from Roam for speed reasons back in March '21. I tried OPMS and JSON, and you can only import one page at a time And when I do that, the page is indeed created in Logseq, but the content of the page is just gone. It does a lot of things just like Roam Research, but has a few additional niceties like an improved Graph View and After about 2 days of research I ended up narrowing down 2 apps: RemNote and Obsidian (other notable-pun intended-mentions include Notion and Roam Research). Are there any list of things, in which roam and logseq are different? Logseq So what are exact difference between roam research and logseq? General. In Logseq, you have to collapse all the bullets to see the full outline, at the expense of not being able to read the note! Super agenda was really nice in emacs/org-roam, I miss the calendar facilities with that although logseq has plugins there are not as good. As for the Logseq tutorial, the most complete one I watched was the paid course "Logseq Mastery" by OneStutteringMindHonestly, since it looks like you aren't that tech savy, I would actually recommend trying Obsidian instead. Even if you're implementing a strict Zettelkasten, the features and plug-ins of Obsidian provide SO many avenues to customization that are much different from what's available in Roam. Logseq also offers a healthy number of plug-ins and themes, but has native support for annotating PDFs He can do outlining in Logseq and whatever happens in Logseq appears in Obsidian and vice versa. Roam Research. page/pkm-kickstartObsidian and Logseq are at the forefront of the note taking space with strong c I've accessed a Logseq instance through a cloud computer sometimes on Paperspace. I mean, painfully slow. It's so ubiquitous, simple and easy to use, I find it hard to believe it'll become a legacy format any time soon. com or Shells. Although Logseq has gained popularity recently for its privacy options, full ownership of notes, and offline functionality, I'm still intrigued If you are already using a PKM app like Roam Research or Obsidian and thinking of switching to Logseq, this article is for you. Logseq is simple and does what it does and allows devs to build on top of it for specific needs people have. , it is much easier to do the synthesis part of your work. The key difference from Logseq and Obsidian is that it has collaborations and users. It's been mismanaged, developed at a glacial pace, way too expensive for what you get, and the community is frankly fucking creepy with how sycophantic they are Obsidian is what I've used most and I like it a lot. Roam and Logseq are much more directly comparable. Switching from Roam/Logseq I used Roam Research before. Other alternatives are Obsidian on its own, Roam Research, and Athens Research as the closest 3 that I know of. While Logseq focuses on looking for (eventually long) paragraphs of text in blocks containing [[wikilinks]] and #hashtags using queries, Tana focuses on specify the relations between its I don't think todos, meetings, people belong to PKMs like logseq & Obsidian and I keep them in database-first tools like Notion. But then i see logseq and it bugs me. Easily done by copy and paste in Obsidian and I guess you haven't suffered from crashing or Logseq deleted note because of conflicts. It really uses up a lot of memory (although I'm told switching to a chromium based browser might help performance) and is pretty laggy. (I've bounced back and forth a bit between RemNote and Coda. Like, there is nothing on the page. I do love the modularity though. Roam is IMHO fairly dated. Both are Zettlekasten type systems. gg/URphjhk Used roam for 2 years and have been using logseq for 7 months, it's great but lately it's been VERY slow. Development speed is blazing fast. ) Therefore the feature request: invoke Emacs Client to edit a block or a file. I’d suggest giving that combo another try it might grow on you. I'm a huge supporter of FOSS so I'd like to know what are the significant differences between Logseq and Obsidian. Logseq will be though, and is already for some: the underlying design is far closer to Roam's (outliner, blocks) and it's been developing fast and the recent fund-raise will only accelerate that (though we thought that about Roam too). They are not the same software, but the workflows for Roam can be easily adapted to Logseq, and there are tons of excellent ideas. It’s wild that the Roam and Logseq default themes The integrations are something that Obsidian, Logseq, Roam are sorely lacking. Both those apps, as you know, have that right side-bar which can hold organizable blocks of information. I am really curious to know what your findings are so far; we should be able to build on Roam is online first, Logseq is offline first, each has their benefits and tradeoffs. Then I saw R. This may or may not suit your needs because you mentioned long time Roam use, but I've only ever used logseq and that only for a couple of months, so it was not hard for me to fall back also, my definition of "block" is at the granularity of a markdown header (plus all its contents), not at a single-bullet-in-a-list level; I neither need nor IMO the graph functionality of Roam/Obsidian/Logseq isn't worth very much. It reproduces some of Roam Research’s key features within Org-mode. If I was moving now, and you can get an invite I would explore Tana. 11 votes, 26 comments. that’s why I don’t want to recklessly jump between apps. Haven't lost any data either, even though I already have like a +1k pages on Logseq. TL;DR: Roam approach is less structured and more suited for creativity. It Some users use apps like Logseq and Roam for that. What I would say is, avoid having Logseq open at the same time on multiple machines to avoid conflicts and also make sure that sync is complete before opening Logseq on another unit. Tbh, i tried all of these apps (obsidian/logseq/roam) and they all feel like toys compared to Emacs + org roam, so went back to that. You can see this clearly just by looking at the menu items along the left side of the Obsidian window: Open quick switcher; Open graph view; Create new canvas The biggest thing that Logseq/Roam are missing for me so far is task management and scheduling/notifications. /r/Statistics is going dark from June 12-14th as an act of protest against Reddit's treatment of 3rd party app That's one limitation I find in Obsidian as I try to get Obsidian to work like Roam or Logseq. Other apps have journal — or “Daily” — pages. VimWiki I am stuck trying to figure out which app to use. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS. include methods like the Zettlekasten System and digital tools such as [[Logseq]]. Now Roam has one too. roam is ok, but i feel like closing myself in if i continue to use it. But what makes those plug ins great is also a weakness. Again, very similar to Roam/Logseq - but feels bit of a shift forward in the way lots of things work. LogSeq makes that possible and we can view any bullet in Logseq's right side pane - just like in Roam. Logseq is under active development while Roam has been encashing their popularity to raise funding and visibility. I use org-roam and the one thing that I really like but struggle to use on my low-spec linux machine is org-roam-ui. Logseq is great for structuring thoughts, however is terrible for long-form writing. Trying to decide between Logseq and Obsidian? Find a complete comparison of features and recommendations for Logseq vs Obsidian here Looking or asking on Obsidina’s forums or Reddit will probably give you a solution. The android app is still laggy though. I cant explain clearly but Logseq is more detailed when we want Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organising and sharing your knowledge base and second brain. Graph Overview: Roam Research uses a graph overview to display how your notes are connected. Org-roam is a tool for networked thought. Nestor's course on doing productivity (task- and project management etc. do vs Roam Research vs Transno vs Logseq vs Remnot vs LearnObit Selection conditions: only those apps that fall into the infinite outliner category are selected Logseq. This one is much harder, because Obsidian and LogSeq are quite similar. It's not a coincidence that it was first-to-market but is no longer the market leader. My main issue is the UX in terms of readability. Most/all of my Logseq info is also in Obsidian, but Obsidian is my main "storehouse" for all things 2nd-brain related. The desktop application is available for Mac and Windows. The biggest pro, I think, is that Capacities has the potential to have stronger integrations that aren't community developed. For example, its version feature is suitable for writing and recording different ideas for For PC questions/assistance. Logseq - It’s like Roam but better. Hope it will release the official version soon. But its search and ability to see lots of information at once is lacking compared to Obsidian. This makes me feel confused if i Generally, when I see logseq vs, it ends with logseq ^^ Welcome to the TickTick Reddit! This community is devoted to the discussion of TicTick, regarding questions during use, tips/tricks, ideas to discuss, news and updates, anything to make TickTick better to use for you! *Note: Most efficient way to reach support team: sending tickets via I can't imagine a better tool than logseq for literature review. (It's been a while since I poked at it at all so I could be off-base. After a day switching back and forth to both I’m really liking Logseq. Here are the main points that can help you make your decision Tried to find on reddit, on this forum, but had no luck. doolio_ • Additional comment actions Currently Im using both logseq and org-mode (org-roam) together but slowly migrating to use logseq only. Never hesitate to ask how to do something in Logseq that you are used to do in Roam. Esp. The most important things for me is simplicity of the markdown - Logseq block solution doesn't seem to work well with other markdown editors. There is a function called org-roam-doctor which will scan your current buffer to look for broken links, and provide an interactive prompt to repair ️ JOIN the FREE PKM KICKSTART COURSE: https://effective. What you're saying is important for Roam Refugees in Obsidian to understand: Different softwares almost inevitably create different workflows. Because Logseq was heavily influenced by Roam, anyone familiar with it will feel at home inside Logseq. Athens is open source. Hello everyone! Great performance — I was debugging and profiling React a lot, the Namely I am thinking of the ability to edit transclusions in place. There is a zettelkasten mode. Reply reply More replies If you like a Zettelkasten, like myself, I've written a 3 part post of how I've configured Org-roam and Logseq to seemlessly integrate and work together. Both have pros and cons. Another place to get some ideas might be search YouTube for Roam Research tutorials. Roam. What does Emacs Org-Roam+Org-Mode have that Obsidian or Logseq doesn’t? And vice versa, what does Obsidian or Logseq have that Emacs Org-Roam-Org-Mode doesn’t? You were also engaged in Reddit last time and this time with a good number of responses. So if you use multiple machines and you go offline frequently, maybe logseq sync's cool conflict resolution algorithm will be for you (but people also report data loss, so shrug). No idea on performance though. Avoid creating pages for everything and scattering your information over unconnected islands. Roam had made a lot of improvements in speed up to then - and has probably made more since. Roam and Tana offer similar functionality. my other and bigger issue is exporting, which is terrible in Roam. io because of this) so that's very exciting. Before I've tried to play with logseq but it was just too damn hard to get simple things to work. Compared with Org-roam, Logseq is amazing for outlining, which suits my workflow very well. Obsidian is a for-profit app. For my part, I have tested doom emacs with org-roam, vim (still learning) and I am using logseq for 4 months. For some users, that limitation may be fine. It's a Medium article and it's old, but that's what he did in 2021 Article: How to Connect Obsidian and Logseq to Get the Best of Both: And why it’s worth it! Tried to find on reddit, on this forum, but had no luck. always something new is coming. Roam's killer plugin is zotero-roam. Obsidian should be the default from this group but there are many options. Gaming. The other platforms feel more plug and play. For me, Roam/Logseq was a great staging ground for me to develop a solid note-taking style. I was initially impressed by the features (automatic back-links, custom properties, queries, PDF annotations, YT video thumbnails etc. Unlike in Obsidian, if you update a block in a Logseq or Roam side pane, the change is automatically reflected in all places where that block appears. Unfortunately converting between org and md is not painless, so you have to choose your format upfront in logseq. Logseq basicly is the combination of Obsidian + Dataview plugin + orgmode + org-roam so it would be the winner here. This sub will be private for at least a In the Obsidian forum we see requests for Obsidian to in some ways function like Roam or Logseq. There isn't a huge difference between the formats. Logseq is a really easy transition from Roam, everything works as you expect and a few things are improved. Hi all, I've If this could go back and forth between {org,md}-roam and had an API that could be used for native mobile/desktop apps it would be all I ever wanted :D I used to outline in Logseq (desktop and PC) and later transfer info into Obsidian. Further on, logseq has a built-in pdf viewer and provides an excellent highlighter. If you want to go for an outlining style with block properties and block embeds and querying those blocks, go for Logseq (or org-roam). Path for windows is C:\Users\<your user name>\AppData\Roaming\Logseq But it gets overwritten after each launch, so practically useless. Roam and then logseq changed how I read literature. Tana is Logseq and Notion merged together if you need more database tables. A work in progress. Also feeling the shiny toy syndrome made me try out many apps, just to forget all about them in It seems like a very small number of people use Emacs for knowledge management. Logseq is open-source and Obsidian isn't. ck. e. gg/URphjhk the reason im questioned here and not orgmode reddit , is that only folks that used or use logseq knows what the good functionalities it have and know if is possible to find something similar on Think of those two as Lego sets without pictures or instructions. Now has a mac app. One thing I agree with, however, is that the logseq core team should focus more on fixing bugs and optimize the current experience rather than implementation of new features. Features of Logseq. do vs Roam Research vs Transno vs Logseq vs Remnot vs LearnObit General Selection conditions : only those apps that fall into the infinite outliner category are selected. I've heard several users complain how slow Roam has become. Obsidian's UI plays a big role in my productivity so even with benefits of Obsidian vs LogSeq. The equivalent would be just making a page called productivity and [[linking]] to it just like you'd [[link]] or #link to it in Roam. So far as I know org-roam uses a flat sqlite3 db file to store pointers back to the file location, this gets translated back to org-mode when you run a function like org-roam-insert so it can add the correct file location to your org-mode file. The Roam team should be embarrassed by Roam's mobile experience (if you can call it an experience). Logseq is a bit more similar to Roam than it is to Obsidian in that it's first and foremost an outliner. Logseq, as I booted it, is Browser based; I am OK with that. LogSeq works from your browser on your local folders. Logseq is not. PDF annotations helped me a lot. I haven't found a better way to organize references and research. Logseq is free. Reply reply The official Python community for Reddit! Stay up to date with the latest news, packages, and meta information relating to the Python programming language. working between two windows and dragging blocks in between them. And that's the point. It's more about remembering what are the special characters and what they do. If you want to organize your notes visually without wading into the whole backlink+Zettelkasten lifestyle, it might be worth trying a concept mapper. Welcome to Reddit and Amplenote! Reading this post made me remember how I was last year - lost between all of these productivity app choices that caused friction - as I needed to check things in 2-3 places at a time to stay caught up in the details. Hyperlink_blocked October 16, 2022, 2:25am 1. Genuinely learning the topic well enough that could write a well researched long paper or even book on the topic. I've been playing around with Logseq, Obsidian, and Roam. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part User Interface: Roam Research’s interface bears some similarities to Obsidian’s, emphasizing the interconnected nature of your notes. Every "block" (the term for bullet point) is pretty much a single entry in a database and they exist, independently in the database. Logseqs weakness is in it's versatility, there's almost too much you could do with it. Org-roam works exactly the way my brain does. it's the best for who's obsessed with organization like me. Logseq, Athens and Roam have a big feature that many Obsidian users request: Logseq’s main developer’s inspiration for Logseq came from org-mode/org-roam. Compared to similar apps such as Obsidian and Roam Research, Logseq is a free alternative that you can use to keep your notes organized. Roam and Logseq are not Evernote replacements. Plus, it can use org syntax, plus we have MD-roam and other MD-based workflows on Emacs. logseq vs roam research in 2023 I'm curious about Roam Research and its current usage among note-takers. nameless912 on Oct 3, 2022 | prev | next. And I used queries and best option in emacs for note taking is org mod plus org roam, and logseq has option to use org formate instead of markdown, and this way in theory you can get the best of both worlds. Apps like Athens, Roam Research and Logseq can do To use Logseq on different computers, I use Google Drive. Logseq I still use for smaller purposes, such as quotes and keywords, that I hashtag for later finding. I decided to try to see how Logseq compared and so I transferred my Vault over to a Logseq graph and it was seriously one of the worst experiences that I ever had with a personal wiki/notes application. I use both Obsidian and Logseq. Also not sure what tool (we have so many now) will open a large note set in <10 seconds. You can, of course, put a frame in, but I don’t consider that an integration. Reply reply Important_Power_5845 that notion can't do every task the best compared to other apps. I started using Roam because it seemed neat, and then I switched to Notion because it seemed Check out the Logseq Discord, there are tons of people on there who know way more than I do and they are really helpful. If you have a specific Keyboard/Mouse/AnyPart that is doing something strange, include the model number i. There is a learning curve, but once your ideas start flirting with each other they will start having great sex. It Copypasta, org-roam is a major mode for keeping notes, authoring documents, computational notebooks, literate programming, maintaining to-do lists, planning projects, and more — in a fast and effective plain text system. Reply reply More replies. It's what Notion should have grown up to be, if it didn't fall in Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organising and sharing your knowledge base and second brain. If it weren't for that plugin, I would be using Logseq right now. GracHol • I think, for me, the biggest difference between them is that a block reference shows you a block from another page (or the same page if that is your jam) and a Hi , I have been using Roam a lot lately and its replaced notion as my default tool. Personally I use Logseq that let me use both approaches, the flow and the structured one, and taking advantage of local Markdown files to perform complex editing using the text manipulation tools available out there, to have in the end pages that acts like an Yes, as u/CulturMultur also mentions, the add-on org-roam-ui shows you a Roam/Logseq/Obsidian style network graph that you can use to navigate, preview notes, open them in Emacs, and even delete nodes. There are few things you need to be careful about like the use of attributes and roam specific features if you want your graph to be compatible with logseq. We're trying to develop a new medium for representing powerful ideas, this is a place to help the team and the community augment our collective intelligence! Please read the rules and try to foster curiosity and good vibes overall! Logseq for outlining and logging notes to view tag-wise. Yet OneNote does things Obsidian and Logseq can If the outliner function were a bit better (ie Roam, RemNote, Logseq) and spaced repetition was a bit more robust (ie RemNote, Anki) it would probably be my go to. I don't really know what the huge difference is between org-mode and markdown. You can use the same hierarchy in your notes, but thanks to blocks, embedded blocks, etc. I am an obsidian user who wishes to migrate over to Logseq, because the latter happens to be open source (it's really a bummer for me that obsidian isn't). OCR search is still an issue with this setup, but that turned out to not be very important to me. Logseq AFAIK takes inspiration from Roam and Obsidian. I love org-roam, but I'm wondering whether it won't be easier in the end to rely on the logseq infrastructure and just use a fairly View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. I have been going back and forth between these 3 and I really like obsidian but unfortunately its not really open source and that makes it a lot weaker but I really really like For sure, it's a biased comparison as I have used Roam/Logseq more. During my research I came across with a lot of comparisons of loqseq vs obsidian or remnote vs roam, etc. I know the color code for the bg of Roam is #E1E8ED, but I don't know the language to change all three Logseq panes. Additionally, Obsidian can do some things not possible in Roam—specifically, incorporating non-outline elements. Logseq and Roam have databases. There are,however, 2 big issues. New happy Logseq user here. In just over 7 minutes, he shows important Logseq features like plain text notes, aliases, PDF annotation, task management, and more. These post describe: Interoperability between the 2 apps. I went from Evernote to Joplin, and then added Logseq for a different kind of note taking. Vim is allowed, as is VScode. As you said they all have promise. I used to keep all my configuration files within my Zettelkasten System and miss being able to write comments around my code linking to other Zettels so really miss the export running/code part of emacs. 99/mo) that already comes with seamless sync and working out if the box. I've heard of people combining it with Obsidian on mobile. It count things from the block-level. Athens is Electron based. Obsidian is more mature and has a bigger community (bigger than Logseq not Roam) Obsidian is more polished than Logseq. And for a non techie person like myself, Logseq's learning curve is a lot steeper. 2) Craft docs: Offline-first app with a visual focus, clean formatting. Unlike obsidian wherein it would take you time to learn and explore good plugins as well. The only advantage of Roam is that it has a really well-developed backlinking system, but even that doesn't work very well because their graph visualization is unusable, so you can't get any benefits from that either. EpiphanicSyncronica summarizes it: powerful outlining all the time. My absolute dream would be to have the ability to drag and drop from my outliner directly onto an hourly / daily / monthly calendar / timeline, so even if this isn't native, having the attributes system + the API and Hey everyone, new to Logseq and trying Roam at the same time. However, each has a certain advantage. Roam is a business with a product, and may be incentivized to focus on building their brand, gaining funding, etc, rather than actually improving the software in any substantial way. Another option is to sync Logseq between devices with syncthing. If it’s too much to digest you can get very far, including backlinks, using just core org-mode and some less elaborate packages. Roam operates in the cloud and can be accessed online. I think Obsidian is amazing for long-form text, but not so great at actually structuring on-page information. Obsidian vs Roam Research vs LogSeq vs RemNote; How to Scrape the Content of a URL / Website Page Behind a Paywall; InfraNodus Obsidian Plugin Installation Instructions; Readwise Alternative: InfraNodus AI Knowledge Roam’s end-to-end encryption; Obsidian’s Live Preview feature; and a whole lot more; We also added a new competitor, LogSeq, which is an interesting Roam-like app that lets users control their library locally on their computer. The same can be said for Logseq. Logseq's UX feels a little last generation, while the alternatives (even Roam) feel more polished. It is not convenient but acceptable. true. Roam and Obsidian are the best options, I chose Obsidian because back in the day they had a mobile app and Roam didn't. Logseq is going to have E2E sync like roam probably within the next few months. It approximates a truly non-hierarchical layout that would allow blocks to have multiple parents/exist in multiple places-- a feature in Trillium Notes, Leo Editor, and Roam (or so I’m told, I have never used Roam). Personal Knowledge Management Systems (PKMS) include methods like the Zettlekasten System and digital tools such as [[Logseq]]. Tried obsidian, it was a bit fiddly but I think it’s a great option for many. Unfortunately, Logseq lacks a few critical editing features for me. ucwh zxtv tzlzh ettzr msn flggd xjxltv chloic yftd bdh