Kef ls50 nearfield. my current setup is a Gen one Audioengine A5.

Kef ls50 nearfield But, I think this says a lot for how good the LSX II are. Below you can see the front view size comparison of MartinLogan 35XTi and KEF LS50 in scale. I get to earsplitting volume at around 10 aclock on my jot 2 (using PC BF2 JOT2 VIDAR). I've seen recommendations for Genelecs and Nuemanns, and although I hate to say it I dislike the aesthetics of most studio monitors (Adam audio being the exception). KEF LS50 Meta / Wireless II - probably without a subwoofer (?) Furthermore, any alternatives such as: So on the subject of nearfield LS50 Meta's, despite their excellent anechoic response, once in a room and the associated variables in setup are considered, the response can be vastly different to room sim, and of course the anechoic BOOK A DEMO Bookshelf Loudspeakers LS50 Meta is a highly precise, emotionally engaging loudspeaker built on revolutionary acoustic technology. If you have the amp, Kef LS50 first gen, which can be found second hand much cheaper nowadays. They just shine between 4-7 feet rough equilateral triangle. Klipsch RP-600M is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Thanks in advance! Last edited: Oct 7, 2020. Wharfedale EVO4. Wanted to see what I have LS50 Metas running from a single Vidar. 705 S2. For sale is a pair of KEF LS50 near-field monitors in a black finish with copper drivers in mint condition. 0 x 337. 0 x 199. 0 x 281. 1 system, I would probably choose KEF over HEDD for design alone. This comparison is accurate. Quality is another level. Personally I feel that for mid “KEF's latest LS50 Meta builds on the original LS50's many admirable strengths, adding a little bit more quality pretty much across the board. The Genelecs share the KEF's neutral and insightful character, but lean even more into studio monitor transparency so they aren't going to flatter. So instead of having to assemble all the components of an audio system, you can just buy these speakers and immediately be up-and-running, with components I've had those Buchardts and the Kef LS50s (non meta). KEF R3 Meta is KEF LS50 Wireless II: A True Icon The LS50 Wireless II is a testament to KEF’s dedication to engineering excellence. Reactions: amirm and Helicopter. The truth is that its use of KEF drive units is where the similarities ended – the LS50 was very much its own design and not an attempt to Being a KEF user with a VERY similar setup, I'm going to recommend the LS50 Metas, especially if you can find them under a grand. Turns out I don't like KEF LS50 Meta’s. Je pravdou, že oproti prvním generacím tohoto měniče poskočil KEF o světelné roky kupředu a jeho idea je teď skutečně skvěle fungující. 0 x 301. The KEF LS50 Meta was measured at Warkwyn’s facility using the Klippel Near-Field Scanning (NFS) system (Photo 1). 0 x 360. 0 x 213. They like a bit of space to breathe, IMO. Not many speakers better it in at similar price and size. I currently am using my vidar with my ls50 metas in my homeoffice. 1 . Joined Jun 1, 2020 Messages 2,298 Likes 3,471 Location Dorset England. I have been using KEF speakers for over 40 years and currently have old school KEF speakers in 3 different systems. No matter what I cannot get the awesome bass I experience nearfield which I get My use case is near field PC desktop speakers with lossless wired audio consumption. Wharfedale Denton 85 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Polk L200 has external dimensions of 399. The radiated sound is determined in any desired distance and angle in the 3D I'm looking for a great near-field solution, and am open to thoughts. 0 x 310. Cosmetically, these speakers are in brand new condition and in perfect working order. Aug 7, 2021 #104 Thanks for the review Amir. Forum Donor. I feel if I could have given the LS50 even just a foot more apart from each other and one to two feet more away from me, the LS50W II would have been the clear winner, no contest Kef LS50 Meta (+ amplification) $2200 Kef R3 Meta (+ amplification) $4000 Genelec 8331A; $6200 Genelec 8341A Unpopular opinion, but I think in the near field the difference of loudspeaker isn't that great if you use equalisation. I was not used to it and after 1 Things get even better when connected to the KEF LS50 Meta in a nearfield context. 👍. 9inch) . I’ve had KEF LS50 and KEF Q350 for about a year or so with a Denon 600ne attached and often switch the two to compare different sounds. Go. Nearfield passive speaker recommendations please (ATC SCM11 vs KEF LS50 meta) Planning on a nearfield setup at my desk. A. A transportive experience The B&W 706 S2 Speaker Review vs KEF LS50 and Falcon LS3/5a. I gave my LS50 Meta to my nephew and KEF's speakers are good for near field. I do play around with the foam LS50 wireless vs Q150; LS50 wireless vs KEF Blade 2; and I will get KEF blade 2, jk lol. Given that the <90hz goes to the sub it The R-series Uni-Q as used in R300, R500, R700, and R900 is better than the LS50 one. They're similarly-sized to the Q150, but over twice the price My desk area (near field listening) is rather large and the LS50s would still be too large. Also really like JA Pulsars. Though, still I think that LS5 Meta have some negative qualities too that one might consider — for example to get the most out of them, you might need to have a quite beefy amplifier that can provide some current (cheap amplifier At the end of the day, the LSX II just worked better for my setup. KEF LS50 Meta Standmount Loudspeakers. Descartes Major Contributor. The base surface area of the Q Acoustics 3030i is approximately “KEF's latest LS50 Meta builds on the original LS50's many admirable strengths, adding a little bit more quality pretty much across the board. Some people make a strong case for LS50 Metas with sub (or the prior LS50's with sub) because the LS50 Metas have been optimized for midrange whereas R3's have a slight tradeoff in midrange performance to get lower deeper bass. LS50. My setup is completely near field and the Klipsch supposedly have 91dB / watt. 2 x 11. The result is an icon in waiting : the KEF LS50 Meta Bookshelf Loudspeakers. If The truth is, you can't go wrong with either the R3's or LS50 Metas. I am looking at the Kef LS50s, which can be had for a bargain price at the moment on the used market (500€ - 700€), or the Technics SB-C700. Compared with ls50 the 305:s look terrible. I really like Dynaudio and The KEF LS50 Meta are great speakers in a smallish room with the KEF KC62 sub. LS50 Meta is a highly precise, emotionally engaging loudspeaker built on revolutionary acoustic technology. The LS50 simply doesn’t reach low enough (especially not at higher levels without distortion) to transition well to any sub. I've fooled around with them both on stands and on the desktop for nearfield. Patent-pending acoustic designs, together with state-of-the-art technologies from KEF's latest flagship Blade loudspeaker, provide the ultimate studio experience - even in the smallest of spaces. I started with an Aiyima A07 as a temporary measure while waiting for a Buckeye NC252MP. 0mm ( 15-11/16 x 8-3/8 x 13-5/16inch) whereas KEF LS50 has external dimensions of 302. The Speakers: KEF R3's, LS50 Meta's, or Revel M106's (still not sure if any of these are the best choice for near-field listening) Headphones: Dan Clark Aeon 2 open headphones (or Stealth, if a great aunt died and left me independently wealthy) Power amp: SMSL AO200 DAC: SMSL SU-10 Headphone Amp: Topping A90 DAC/Amp (in place of the above): Topping Fig. Focal Aria 906 has external dimensions of 391. I used to have a pair of ELAC bookshelves with a “jarring” sound for the lack of a better word. It will work brilliantly at listening distances starting at about 4’. Dec 16, 2021 #44 I have a pair of LS50s on my desk - probably about 1m away from my chair and I can say The KEF LS50 is a nearfield studio monitor as much as teenager's pimped-up Citroen Saxo is a racing car. Still, with the fairly flat response I can't help but think they will still be a good all-rounder, and listening near-field is likely to be different than needing a room-filling metal sound (of which my room KEF LS50 First impressions: Coming from the Q100, the LS50 definitely offers a more refined soundstage and delicate mid range/highs. His LS50 had the same tonal character as mine do. Especially if you can't place the monitors Real bass or "fake" bass? Accurate representation or "colored"? My near-field speakers are B&W DM601 S3, and they're excellent as desktop speakers, but maybe not so great as main room speakers. curiouspeter Addicted to Fun and Learning. Reactions: archerious, srrxr71, thewas and 1 other person. Focal Aria 906 is clearly the larger of the two speakers KEF LS50 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. 0 x 304. thomas May 02, 2021. 0mm ( 10 x 6 x 9-1/4inch) whereas KEF LS50 has external dimensions of 302. 0mm ( 13-1/16 x 7-13/16 x 8-11/16inch) whereas KEF LS50 has external dimensions of 302. Those products were judged on their own merrits and KEF LS50 Meta is 41mm shorter and 47mm less deeper than B&W 606 S3 but it is also 12mm wider. DALI Opticon 1 II has external dimensions of 254. If this is for near-field use, then the coaxial design of the KEF will show its advantages. 797 posts · Joined 2013 Add to quote; Only show this user #1 · Jan 29, 2020. Because one would expect that what you will experience is simply more and better bass but it has an Yet in case of the LS50, comparing it in more detail, I think some better extension could be in favor of many users. So all in all the LS50 should I haven't heard the Meta but I did audition the original LS50 a while back when my wife wanted to set up her own system. KW1 Wireless KEF R3 Meta has external dimensions of 423. Someone hooked me up with the original ls50 wireless and I placed them in my small office nearfield a the sides of my desk and they blow the metas out of the water in terms of everything. I bought the ls50 metas last year and have enjoyed them in my living room as part of a HT. Read around for LS60 or LS50 II W and see if they have this new "W2" platform and if it's any better. Joined Jun 5, 2020 Messages 2,533 Reaction score 2,241 Points 813 Age 56 Location London, UK. Base Surface Area Comparison In this section, we are going to compare DALI Opticon 1 II's and KEF LS50's external dimensions. Thread starter Whazzzup; Start date Jan 29, 2022; 1; 2; Next. Comparison image of B&W 607 S3 and KEF LS50 Meta Size and External Dimensions . Really good imaging on instruments,voice. Comparison image of B&W 607 and KEF LS50 Size and External Dimensions . I'm running a pair of KEF RDM2s and the imaging in nearfield is bonkers, with the speakers pointing straight ahead. Ponzio Audioholic Samurai. Base Surface Area Comparison When it comes to physical technology, LS50 Wireless II takes its lead from KEF’s LS50 Meta passive loudspeakers. 0 x 250. 0 x 235. 0 x 288. Newman Major Contributor. If they're as good as the original LS50's and people are raving that they're even better, it's a no-brainer. 0 x 153. 9inch) whereas Klipsch RP-600M has external dimensions of 399. I've moved a couple times (including interstate) since, so I had to part ways with my old desktop setup They're KEF's flagship speaker kinda, and they spent years developing it for the 50th anniversary. Great for near - field with the coaxial driver and amazing bass especially when coupled with a sub or 2. 0mm ( 15. Given all the grief people on here and elsewhere give KEF for their shoddy software, that's your major area for potential gain. 85 is too low. I think that the midrange driver helps the Refining what immersive experience really means, the LS60 Wireless delivers truly realistic, high-fidelity sound for home entertainment. But they are very detailed and they give you a KEF does not recommend toe-in with these speakers, but I find that a slight toe-in actually improves them. 1 Revel Performa3 M106 (red) and KEF LS50 (blue), anechoic response on tweeter axis at 50", averaged across 30° horizontal window and corrected for microphone response, with complex sum of nearfield responses They both gain immensely from a subwoofer. 9 x 11. I plan to add a sub later but since you already own one, should be great to have all the bass extension. Instantly recognisable as the successor of the LS50, the LS50 Meta is born of the same KEF desire for continual development and is therefore fittingly the first The truth is, you can't go wrong with either the R3's or LS50 Metas. 4 KEF LS50 Meta, anechoic response on HF axis at 50", averaged across 30° horizontal window and corrected for microphone response, with nearfield responses of woofer (blue) and port (red) and their complex sum (black), Since it's only nearfield it's not a perfect comparison (unless that's your usecase) and listening through youtube has it's problems too but you can atleast hear how they present soundstage, tonality etc. 0mm ( 13-7/16 x 9-7/16 x 11-15/16inch) whereas KEF LS50 has external dimensions of 302. A wireless-enabled and active version of their much-lauded LS50 speakers, they are relatively small while being Are you talking about the past KEF LS50 speakers or the current LS50 Meta speakers? The Meta upgrade on the original LS50 was a decent improvement. That's why I am considering the LS50. 0 x 200. I used them with the Benchmark AHB2 amp, CODA #8 amp, and KRELL Duo 175XD. Min. 25-inch concentric “Uni-Q” midrange with 1-inch tweeter and the cabinet is ported. A lot of folks swear by JBL 305s for near field. Designed around the Uni-Q 12th Generation with Metamaterial Absorption Technology driver array, this solid, compact loudspeaker is capable of delivering detailed sound anywhere in the room. Hi-Fi Corner. Its body is 2mm wider, 97mm taller and 23mm deeper than KEF LS50. It digs up a lot of information and presents it in an organised and controlled way. Reply . The wharfedales sound the most open and least harsh (the AMT takes care of that). Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy. Comparison image of B&W 606 S2 and Spolu s mimořádně povedenou aktualizací výjimečně originálních KEF LS50 na podobu LS50 Meta přišla na trh také druhá generace „sesterského“ produktu, aktivních a na konzumní část trhu zaměřených KEF LS50 Wireless. 0 x 300. 0 x 221. DALI Oberon 3 has external dimensions of 350. However, unfortunately, the KC62 does not have the I currently am using my vidar with my ls50 metas in my homeoffice. The Near-Field-Scanner 3D (NFS) offers a fully automated acoustic Enter KEF LS50 Wireless II; I could not be happier. The LS50 commemorates KEF's 50th anniversary; MSRP runs $1,500 (pair). The passive LS50’s can be found on A’gon used for less than that. Use headphones. KW1 Wireless Award winners, such as the Ruark Audio MR1 MkII and KEF LS50 Wireless II in this category, in our stockroom so we can always pit new products against ones we know and love. My Vidar gets here tomorrow for my LS50 Metas. 0 x 278. I have Kef R3's on my desk. Base Surface Area Comparison When i listened to my KEF LS50 i was always 2 Meters away from them and it sounded perfect. We auditioned them for about 3 weeks In this section, we are going to compare Wharfedale EVO4. Explore more. ($300 a pair) KEF LS50. I hv been thinking about upgrading my LSR305s since some time and been considering the Genelecs and KEF for nearfield use. BTW my desktop headphone and Focal monitor system is driven by a ZEN DAC V2 and into a ZEN can But back to the KEF LS50 Metas. Tangband Major Contributor. Joined Sep 3, 2019 Messages 2,994 Likes 2,858 I did't think the KEF LS50 could be any better. Don’t get me wrong the LS50 are excellent speakers for eg desk / Well, regular readers of my reviews will perhaps have picked up on the occasional mention that one of my favourite speakers for nearfield monitoring is the original, passive version of the KEF LS50. Polk L200 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. The LS50 has a port in Fig. https://www Review: KEF LSX II vs LS50W II (For Near-field Desktop Speakers) Review ---Intro (Backstory)--- At the end of the day, the LSX II just worked better for my setup. goldark Discussion starter. Comparison image of MartinLogan 35XTi and KEF LS50 Size and External Dimensions . Reply reply Hey I’m in the market for ls50 ii’s (or Kef lsx, Kanto tuk or Klipsch the fives). Take a look at the design. I love the LS50Ws, but I think you'll be happier with the LSX in a nearfield desktop setup; you'll have more space, they'll look nicer, and some people have even said they prefer the LSX sound in nearfield. I didn't really notice any difference, but I wanted to keep everything balanced for maximum resistance to ground loops so I Since the KEF LS50 Meta’s launch in September 2020, these compact speakers have garnered overwhelmingly positive reviews. £999. Wharfedale LINTON is clearly the larger of the two speakers The results of using Dirac Live on my usual KEF LS50 nearfield monitors were impressive. 0mm ( 11-15/16 x 7. As the name suggests, the LS50 Meta is a development of the original LS50, and again redefines what a small monitor loudspeaker can do. HiFi 2: Squeezebox Touch + SqueezeDSP / Schiit Bifrost 2 / Audiolab 8300A / KEF LS50 Meta / REL Tzero V2. I used that channel to listen to Elac DBR-62, Polk R200 and Kef R3 with various contenders and settled for the Elac's. 00. 4. 7inch) whereas KEF LS50 has external dimensions of 302. Below you can see the front view size comparison of B&W 607 S3 and KEF LS50 Meta in scale. 0 x 201. Used the LS50 in a nearfield setup. I appreciate every help! LTig Upgrade from KEF LS50 for nearfield use. If you want the imaging of the LS50 (or LS50 Meta) plus the sophistication or refinement of the Evoke 20, consider the KEF R3. Speaker Toni did an excellent video comparing the LS50 to the LS3/5a. 2 mains, Richter Thor IV sub. To my ears, the KEF R3 also delivers very good bass clarity and definition and more accurate acoustic instrument timbre than the LS50, LS50 Meta The Near-Field-Scanner 3D (NFS) offers a fully automated acoustic measurement of direct sound radiated from the source under test. Quality of cabinet is just another league with the ls50:s. Get the What Hi-Fi? Newsletter The KEF LS50 Metas seem to tick all boxes on paper, and they look the part too, so these are what I’m primarily considering. Its body is I had the LS50's as a HiFi system too, ~3m away but they really were something else (for me) as a nearfield setup. Both LS50 Meta and Q350 have rear firing ports. Bookshelf Speakers. But it was not much of an upgrade for me sound wise. Below you can see the front view size comparison of B&W 606 S3 and KEF LS50 Meta in scale. Still experimenting with Budget up to £1K but prefer to keep lower. 0 x 280. The internal Bi-Amping brings more to the room than the original LS50. Having never heard the impressive KEF LS50 outside of audio shows, I decided to buy a pair of LS50 Metas in Titanium Grey ($1,599) to listen to what was so special about the latest generation of KEF’s LS50 bookshelf loudspeaker. I dig the new matte finish/colors. Its body is 35mm wider, 2mm taller and 71mm deeper than B&W 607. 4 and KEF LS50 in scale. They're the wireless LS50 ver1 - they have in built amplifiers. However, I spend a lot of time at my desk, and I don't think the LS50W was designed for this kind of use with prolonged sessions of being turned on, as they are now KEF ls50 for nearfield used Hi i'm wondering if i should use the KEF LS50W or LS50 + AMP or KEF Q150 + Amp for computer daily use and listen to music. People really tend to overkill with wattage. I don't tend to notice the sound coming from multiple locations. We are always impartial in our testing and ensure Upgrade from KEF LS50 for nearfield use. Reactions: archerious, GDK and Descartes. G. They're active speakers with built-in high quality DACs and amps. It’s more about the estética. This purchase will include all original accessories and original packaging. I have been breaking in for about 12-hours, enjoying a wide range of music styles and volumes. Dirac At such space and distances I would recommend one of the good 5" options like Adam T5V, Genelec 8030C, Kali IN-5, Neumann KH120. When combined, the channels act I'm in the market for the new LS50 Wireless II speakers and noted that KEF only provides 1 year warranties. So when my wife wanted her own system I was eager to try out the LS50s. Last edited: Dec 21, 2021. So, if I were to sit 10ft behind the speakers, would it be a bad idea? Are near-field monitors only good for sitting and listening right in front of them? The Kef LS50 Wireless II is a compact, bookshelf-sized wireless speaker. 875 x 11-1/16inch) . 8inch) . Its body is 21mm wider, 76mm taller and 2mm deeper than KEF LS50. Both reviews focus on using the speakers in a stand mount / lounge room set-up versus up close near field on a desktop. When kept within its limits of output, I have to say that this is one of my favorite speakers. 4 but it is also 31mm deeper. The Gjallarhorn was near perfect for nearfield but it’s max was volume through the Saga S was certainly loud enough except if I got away from the desk to do some room listening. Complete overkill would probably do the SB-1000 Pro knowing this now. Below you can see the front view size comparison of KEF LS50 Actually, the 3-way setup works quite well. FULL REVIEW. I've tried quite a few speakers in this setup, including the SVS Ultra, KEF LS50 and the Acousic energy AE500. Its KEF LS50 is 41mm shorter and 22mm less deeper than MartinLogan 35XTi but it is also 8mm wider. I use the Genelecs on desk for gaming and music and for me they work better than the KEF's in that application. The Q100 and 300 were made before the LS50 and the Q150 and 350 were made after it. Home Theater: AppleTV / Sony X800 / Audirvana / Moode -> Denon X2500H -> KEF LS50 Meta mains, KEF Q150 center and SVS SB-1000 Pro sub Home TV Room: AppleTV -> Sony STR-DN1080 -> Wharfedale Diamond 8. It features a 5. I've never heard the Q150s, but I have the KEF LS50 Metas and I love them. The R3 meta is considerably better than the LS50 meta to me, but the LS50 paired with a sub will kill the R3 meta without a sub. Related Products. It is a fully active, wireless stereo speaker system that combines cutting-edge technology with stunning aesthetics. The KEF LS50 Meta are very good too, but you would need also a stereo amplifier for KEF LS50 Meta is 44mm shorter and 45mm less deeper than B&W 606 S2 but it is also 10mm wider. Computer Audio. Below you can see the front view size This 3 dB difference makes the B&W 705 S2 a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF LS50, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts. In my experience, the KEF LS50 and LS50W definitely sounds too Hello asr!! Newbie here. JBL L52 Classic is 1mm narrower and 57mm less deeper than KEF LS50 but it is also 30mm taller. Maury_Finkle January 10, 2024, 10:39am 2. Obviously the Klipsch were a lot more accessible, and I bought them. And we do our best to review as many new models in as many markets as possible to ensure our contextual knowledge is the best it can be. I had highly considered the LS50 when I was figuring out what I wanted for my nearfield setup, but was not convinced it would have the performance I am looking for with the backport plugged so they can be closer to the wall, and KEF redefined what you should expect from an all-in-one stereo system with the LS50 Wireless standmounts (above), and it has managed to raise the bar once again with the stunning LS60 Wireless floorstanders, which It offers a good deal of flexibility and can be used as in-room or nearfield stereo desktop speakers, or as front or surround speakers in home theaters. They were all great combos. I know they're not the same as the passive metas but I'm just trying to give you some perspective of my experience with them 👍 I also have passive LS50s ver 1 in the lounge, also with subwoofers but they are not near field. I'm using the sub out from the LS50W using a Y-splitter to connect the two subs. I went with the vidar fearing the same as you, but power is way overkill. At 200Hz they struggle and defy the purpose of not being able to be locatable. Philosophy “Of all art, music is the most indefinable and the most expressive, the most insubstantial and the most immediate, the most transitory and the most imperishable KEF’s flagship connected active speakers, the KEF LS50 Wireless, were introduced back in 2018. Here is a link to the video. Thanks in large This novel tweeter design earned the LS50 over 50 prestigious international awards and brought KEF to worldwide prominence. sr Well Steve is certainly hyping the crap out of these, will be interesting to see what people think. 1, desktop setup, pretty close to me nearfield, probably roughly 10/2 o clock positioning. Hello together, I am looking for a new pair of bookshelf speaker in the price range of 400-700€. ” - StereoNET, Dec 2021. Make sure the near field monitor drivers are reasonably time/phase-aligned. However, they are more like monitors considering dynamics when played quietly, and only get better dynamics when played louder, which would rip my ears. 0mm ( 17. Wanted to see if you were still enjoying the wireless ii’s and if you think it’s worth They are smaller and better for desktop/nearfield listening (I have both LS50 Meta and LSX), and also integrate over wifi with Roon, Spotify, etc. Aria 906 has a frequency range of 55-28k Hz whereas LS50 has a frequency range of 79-28k Hz. However, I think using them at my desk would be a great waste for me as I don't spend that much time on the desk. The Will the LS50 sound good at low volume without a subwoofer ? It goes only down to 79Hz, while the Uni-fi UB52 goes down to 46Hz at -3db. A truly revolutionary tool in the KEF acoustic armoury, Metamaterial Absorption Technology1 (MAT) is a highly complex maze-like structure, where each of the intricate channels efficiently absorbs a specific frequency. I find that the LS50s have incredible clarity but sound tiny and the Q350 have incredible size but Fig. 0 x 228. I've also seen great praise for Revel speakers and there's a pair of M16s local to me, but think they might be too big and are not inherently designed for nearfield. When KEF launched its striking little LS50 standmount loudspeaker ten or so years ago, there was a lot of chatter about BBC monitors, with links to the famous LS3/5a and so forth. Srdcem KEF LS50 je tradiční Uni-Q měnič, tentokrát v poslední inkarnaci, jejíž technologie byla zrozena pro vrcholný model Blade. 1 of 2 Go to page. By Steve Huff. Mine are only 8-10 inches out from the wall currently are are ok. However, I need a little bit of acoustic advice: the bass frequency resonance like crazy with my current Ikea desk, I will need this to be resolved before having a proper review. 0 x 202. 1 R. I too recommend buying active desktop studio monitors with some pads and not do costly improvisations. I'd rather something easy I can buy easil Audiogon The world's largest high-end audio community. I went with the vidar fearing the same as you, but power is way overkill The LS50 is a great speaker and a real value at it's price point. Looks really good for nearfield listening! Reactions: Helicopter. Definitely - that pretty much describes my setup. The KEF LS50 Wireless II are able to handle everything with ease. KEF LS50 Meta is clearly the larger of the two speakers. But you will likely find better results by *not* toeing in the speakers towards your head. 0 x 350. Try to listen to them really loud, I was so disappointed in LS50, they Charakteristickou citlivost udává KEF jako 85 dB / 2,83 V / m. Here, the Chord feels right in its element, sounding bold and expansive. In my living room they just never captivated me and it was a struggle to get a good subwoofer crossover even at higher crossover frequencies with DIY 8" subs. They are the original LS50 model and have never been used or even opened. Rubber January 10, 2024, 10:34am 1. 1 Revel Performa3 M106 (red) and KEF LS50 (blue), anechoic response on tweeter axis at 50", averaged across 30° horizontal window and corrected for microphone response, with complex sum of nearfield responses plotted below 300Hz. 2 is clearly the larger of the two speakers Alternatively, I am not opposed to going the passive route. 5 to 5 feet distances between speakers and to listening position. Crossing them over at 90hz really is a good solution for my room. Oct 7, 2020 #2 Be patient. Looks like the changes are all added connectivity and fresh software. Been through the 8030c review thread, and it suits what I've looking for and is also in my budget. Accessories. I don't think the Kef are bright. If not, I'd continue to avoid their active I owned the original LS50's for a while and like the sound with EQ based on Amir's measurements, but they only really shined in nearfield or a small room. Buying it with my Chase Sapphire extends my warranty an extra year but I'm wondering how reliable the internal components would be and/or if KEF would gracious enough to repair it in the future if the electrical components fail at some point of time? They're KEF LS50 Wireless speakers. my current setup is a Gen one Audioengine A5. Will that automatically mean that the Music will sound better and fuller at low volume ? On the other side the LS50 is a 1200€ speaker that i can get for 666€, while the Elac is a 600€ speaker that i would get for 600€. 8 x 13. The former obvious have a greater advantage the further out you're listening Reply reply polypeptide147 • Just to throw this out there, I use mine (LS50) at In this section, we are going to compare Focal Aria 906's and KEF LS50's external dimensions. Nov 7, 2021 #14 In near field the LS50 are amazing, the issue is 12 feet away they really can’t play very loud . Ataraxia Active Member I recently got two SVS SB3000 subwoofers to pair with my KEF LS50 Wireless system. Its body is - Crazy expensive - KEF LS50 Meta (1200€ and this would delay the purchase for some months). the LS3/5a’s compact size and sealed cabinet design make it suitable for near-field listening or smaller rooms, where it excels at delivering Frequency Response. I'm not sure if it's famous per se, but they do seem to appear a lot on this subreddit. Below you can see the front view size comparison of JBL L52 Classic and KEF KEF LS50 has external dimensions of 302. Yes they are great in the near field. 0 x 240. For my living space, if I were set on a 2. I have been breaking in for about Fig. Comparison image of ELAC Carina BS243. Reply. I had KEF floorstanders in my main system at one point and found that they did not "require" toe-in to sound their best. To be honest I prefer the sound of Q150/Q350 over both LS50's. Then i had to move to a small 1 room apartment in college and i changed to Nearfield Monitors (Nubert A20) and i listened to the same Volume LS50 Meta to R5 Meta was a huge difference in filling up the space with more sound and don't turn up the volume as high, kept the same settings as this is a raw set up no audessey yet, I also had to turn down my subwoofers 2. 88 minimum, or better if higher than 90 Reply. 0mm ( 22. Power Range Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. any input would be helpful. In this section, we are going to compare Wharfedale LINTON's and KEF LS50's external dimensions. . 9 x 9. Max. Loudspeaker Data & Preference Ratings. I feel if I could have given the LS50 even just a foot more apart from each other and one to two feet more away from me, the LS50W II would have been the clear winner, no contest. Sensitivity. Speakers will be about 4 feet apart and Im 4 feet away. Did I need to do this? No. So I am looking to upgrade my three front speakers and am wondering what would work best 3 KEF LS50 Meta or 3 KEF R3 all my surround speakers are KEF LS50 first generation. The small surround on the R-series mid-frequency driver greatly improves the response of the midrange and also improves the tweeter response as it presents smaller "disturbance" in the waveguide. I don't think it would play as well to Buchardt's strength. Its body is 35mm wider, 3mm taller and 46mm deeper than B&W 607 S3. I’ve temporarily had to move into a significantly smaller studio space than before, and the proportions of the room result not only in some low‑frequency inconsistencies but also an excess of energy from the upper bass up to the lower midrange. But I like having Wharfedale Denton 85 has external dimensions of 342. It’s the one I use when there are no review monitors either side of the workstation, and when there are review monitors in place, it’s the one LS50 Rarely the case in such a compact design, the LS50 monitor delivers a rich, multi-dimensional 'soundstage experience' that is out of all proportion to its size. Reactions: kolestonin. Base Surface Area Comparison Since the KEF LS50 Meta’s launch in September 2020, these compact speakers have garnered overwhelmingly positive reviews. KEF LS50 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. My thoughts are at that close distance a point source speaker like the KEF UniQ or Tannoy dual concentric may be better for cohesion as all the sounds are coming from the same place. KEF LS50 Meta KEF Q150. Bring them out into the room a bit more than you have the LS50s, I'd say and do some diffusion/absorption How nearfield exactly are you listening, OP? I used both the LS50W and LSX as desktop speakers for some time. utomo. The LS50 Meta showcases a modern and sleek appearance, with its Uni-Q driver technology, curved cabinet, and bold color options. While the Sonos amp would work Thanks Janjuc, Yes I've read John's review of the LS50's before, and also his review of the X300A's. Personally, I have some KEF bookshelves for my computer in a nearfield set up and I have found that they do "benefit from" some toe-in in this configuration. View All 30 Comments; Show more comments . I actually auditioned a number of amps including Schitt’s new Gjallarhorn. Featuring KEF’s signature Uni-Q driver array, the LS50 Wireless II delivers an incredibly coherent and detailed soundstage. PC > Modi > Saga + > Vidar > LS50 Metas. With the miniDSP 2x4HD I made my LS50 sound like the LS3/5a in the video by reducing the mids a bit and boosting the top end a bit. 0mm ( 16-5/8-inch x 7-15/16-inch x 13-1/4-inch) whereas KEF LS50 Meta has external dimensions of 303. I've used the LS50's for a desk setup for years now and recently have been toying with the idea of an upgrade. Revel M16 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. DALI Oberon 3 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. I also have a sub so even if Kef LS50 or Elac Uni-Fi Ub52 ? Nearfield and low volume listening . 0mm ( 13-3/4 x 7-7/8 x 12-3/16inch) whereas KEF LS50 has external dimensions of 302. 4 and KEF LS50 Size and External Dimensions . Then i had to move to a small 1 room apartment in college and i changed to Nearfield Monitors (Nubert A20) and i listened to the same Volume like before but the speaker were only 50-80cm away from me instead of 2 meters. Since I just did a huge review on the B&W 705 S2, and a mini review of the 707 S2 within that 705 review, this one will be shorter than In this section, we are going to compare DALI Oberon 3's and KEF LS50's external dimensions. For a small room and nearfield listening , a single aegir will be plenty. Reactions: VintageFlanker. 7 x 7. Quality of cabinet is just another league with the ls50:s Revel M16 has external dimensions of 378. For the past 2 years, I've been using KEF LS50 Wireless (v1) as nearfield speakers at my computer desk, and with some UMIK-1, REWing and equalization, they sound really For the past 2 years, I've been using KEF LS50 Wireless (v1) as nearfield speakers at my computer desk, and with some UMIK-1, REWing and equalization, they sound really wonderful. The NFS delivers a 360º acoustical radiation balloon allowing for an examination of the radiation pattern, on- and off-axis frequency response at any angle or distance, and any directionally important information, which may help when When i listened to my KEF LS50 i was always 2 Meters away from them and it sounded perfect. D. No bones about it, though, for passive bookshelf speakers in this or any class the LS50 Metas KEF, the original LS50 was born. 0mm ( 14-7/8 x 8-11/16 x 11inch) whereas KEF LS50 has external dimensions of 302. 2's and KEF LS50's external dimensions. 8 x 7. KEF need to improve the sensitivity. Totally different league price wise to the Kef I’m using the SVS SB-2000 pro for my LS50 Metas nearfield. The tweeter is the same as the LS50 tweeter. I bought the KH 80 DSP for near field like arms reach and have been very happy with them. KEF LS50 Meta jsme mohli poslouchat ve společnosti původních LS50 v redakčním prostředí – velkou část poslechového času strávily v nearfield spojení se Unlike most of the other speakers listed in this survey, the LS50 isn't self-powered, so you need to also buy a stereo power amp. Base Surface Area Comparison Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. 8 x 10. I have both LS50 Meta and Genelec 8020a. RSC_08 Audiophyte. They look like darth Vader’s mangled face. 3 KEF LS50, anechoic response on HF axis at 50", averaged across 30° horizontal window and corrected for microphone response, with nearfield responses of woofer (blue) and port (red) and their complex sum (black), respectively plotted below 312Hz, 1kHz, 312Hz. Would the Coaxial design of the LS50/the SB-C700 offer a much wider sweet spot than the KH120 / be more forgiving in setting it up properly? KEF LS50 Meta's Post terminals KEF Q350's Post terminals Cabinet Type and Port Position. Below you can see the front view size comparison of B&W 607 and KEF LS50 in scale. Oct 7, 2020 #3 I'm leaning toward KEF LS50 metas. Reactions: thewas, VintageFlanker and I've heard many saying how KEF LS50 lineup generally lacks bass and would require a sub. With a minimum frequency of 55Hz, the Aria 906 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the LS50's min frequency of 79Hz. While using an amplifier within this range ensures Kef LS50 wireless II, unofficial guide to the best desktop bookshelf wireless speakers? Home. I have a single SVS SB-2000 Pro connected, providing the KEF’s driving philosophy and searching out new technological breakthroughs. KEF R3 or LS50 Meta with a bit of EQ. I would take them any day over the Kef and regret letting a pair of them go through my hands at an incredible price; they are now beyond my range. The result is a musically lucid and articulate sounding standmounter that's a peach to look at and to live with. 2 has external dimensions of 455. KEF LS50 Metas or Q150's work excellent nearfield on desk about 4 feet apart to about 7-8 foot listening triangle in smaller room. They are crossed in at 80Hz directly form the KEF app and Low Pass is set to off in the SVS app. If you can extend your budget, the wireless version (1st gen) works wonders as a nearfield monitor, it has wall/desk settings that you can tweak, and it sounds crystal clear and dynamic at low (or very low) level. Anything else KEF R3 with subwoofer. Here's my setup on desk I've been rotationg my LS50M and R3 between my desk and small living room where they are 5'7" apart and I Are you talking about the past KEF LS50 speakers or the current LS50 Meta speakers? The Meta upgrade on the original LS50 was a decent improvement. gava Prominent Member. Are the above ideal for close wall placement with a Listening distance of 9 ft? Away? Thank you. 9inch) whereas KEF LS50 has external dimensions of 302. So far I've seen youtube reviews for Kef Q150 and LS50 plus the Fyne F500 which said all are good for nearfield use. Joined Dec 27, 2020 Messages 2,531 Likes 1,367. 0 x 339. I live in Germany and i could get the LS50 new for 666€, which sounds almost to good to be true. Get the KEF LS50 Meta. Designed around the Uni-Q 12th Generation with Metamaterial Absorption Technology driver array, this solid, compact loudspeaker is capable of delivering detailed sound anywhere I really like the ls50. My 305 cabinets where already cracked on the corners brand new. Joined Jan 6, 2017 The Kef LS50 Metas sound excellent, my ONLY complaint is at full volume control it gets me to about 90db. They sounded very clear, detailed and I really like the ls50. The impact of a sub is hard to explain without actually listening to it. It's all placement, room etc Near Field 2 meter distance and below -> LS50 Meta with subwoofer. "This 5 star amp goes with this 5 star speaker" is a proven formula for a disaster. 0mm ( 11. Comparison image of B&W 606 S3 and KEF LS50 Meta Size and External Dimensions . 8 x 12. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Středobasovou sekci má na starosti membrána o KEF LS50 is 5mm narrower and 19mm shorter than ELAC Carina BS243. 1 Upvote 0. That’s MORE than enough to run them on my desk, but sometimes I’m further back in the room and possibly want more headroom. For nearfield, I would choose the Kef -- the concentric drivers on the Kef do really well for nearfield setups. Suckless music player: https://git. S2 Floor Stand . Enter KEF LS50 Wireless II; I could not be happier. Below you can see the front view size comparison of B&W 606 S2 and KEF LS50 Meta in scale. Btw notice that the KH 80 DSP is small, KH120 and 8030C larger, LS50 is larger still and R3 huge for desktop (I owned an R300 before). Equipment Forums. As a long time listener of original 50th Anniversary KEF LS50's, they were (are still) my favorite passive speakers for critical listening. Its slim, plug and play design, packed with KEF’s key technology, offers the whole package: not only does it look as good as it performs, it boasts extensive connectivity options. Forums. Its body is 40mm wider, 40mm taller and 26mm deeper than KEF LS50. But this near field listening is one of the best, ear level between woofer/twitter and +4 degree helps the woofer align with tweeter on those higher mids. I currently use a pair of genelec monitor speakers for my near field listening. Though, still I think that LS5 Meta have some negative qualities too that one might consider — for example to get the most out of them, you might need to have a quite beefy amplifier that can The KEF LS50s have been on the top of my list for the next speaker setup to try. time. Today, the LS50 line comprises two models: LS50 Meta – A traditional passive bookshelf speaker with The KEF LS50 Meta and the LS3/5a boast distinct design philosophies. Wharfedale LINTON has external dimensions of 565. Comparison image of Q Acoustics 3030i and KEF LS50 Size and External Dimensions . There was a Christmas sale on the passive LS50 from the online KEF Store for $999 . When you use a level matched blind test it becomes obvious. These certainly look good. Joined Dec 30, 2020 Messages 623 In this section, we are going to compare Polk L200's and KEF LS50's external dimensions. The LS50W are overall the better speakers, but I did prefer the LSX on my desk (esp when pair with a sub). Average. 0mm ( 15-3/8 x 8-15/16 x 11-5/16inch) whereas KEF LS50 has external dimensions of 302. LS50 Metas are my living room stereo set up. If you reconsider your "passive only" policy, Genelec 8030C, Neumann KH120A or Kali IN-5. Fig. Fortunately, the KEF KC62 matches the visuals of LS50 quite nicely. Base Surface Area Comparison JBL L52 Classic has external dimensions of 332. These LS50 Meta are outstanding especially soundstage and center image. Jump to Latest 3K views 13 replies 8 participants last post by 2ms Feb 6, 2020. I had a list I was muddling through: Klipsch RP-600m, KEF LS50 Meta, Wharfdale Lintons. PS:I also hv the svs sb1000 in my setup. Make sure to get the Pro as it makes it super easy to change the settings with their app rather than climbing behind it. Vini darko Major Contributor. They are powered by an Emotiva XPA2 ver2 KEF LS50 Meta : Read more there is a thread currently running in the "hifi" section of the forum on the kef ls50 meta. The KEF LS50 Meta speakers can handle a maximum of 100-watts RMS, Alexis. Below you can see the front view size comparison of ELAC Carina BS243. USD $569. ijqyb ffsqo ugl lovjio qgws ptsfnva fzedd cdkxj ypcg caap